:

Paulist Center Endowment: Letter to Cummins, Inc.

October 11, 2007

Mr. Theodore M. (Tim) Solso   
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Cummins, Inc.  
500 Jackson Street
Columbus, Indiana    47202-3005

Dear Mr. Solso,

Boston Common Asset Management, LLC (Boston Common) is an asset manager serving investors concerned about the social impact as well as financial return of their investments. We write today on behalf of the undersigned shareowners, which own in total 215,485 shares of Cummins, Inc. common stock. Of those shares, Boston Common’s clients own 18,765 shares of Cummins, Inc. stock.

As shareowners in Cummins, we have become increasingly concerned by the escalating labor union conflict between the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (Teamsters) and Cummins’s distribution segment companies. We believe Cummins has a responsibility to address the situation. We consider the persistent anti-union allegations against Cummins’s distribution segment companies to be a threat to Cummins’s reputation and shareowner value.  Some of the undersigned shareowners participated in the September 5, 2007 Cummins conference call sponsored by the Social Investment Research Analysts Network (SIRAN) but believe Cummins responses on that call to these allegations to be unsatisfactory.

A new report by Professor Lance Compa details numerous instances of possible violations of labor rights by Cummins companies. In Every Abuse 1 Prof. Compa claims: “Disregarding international human rights standards, Cummins has undertaken what appears to be a multi-year, multi-faceted, coordinated plan to eliminate collective bargaining in more than twenty regional distribution and service locations over the past 15 years.” His key charges include the following:

“Cummins engages in the following anti-union, anti-worker-rights activity:
• reincorporating ownership structure of regional distribution and service centers while
maintaining the same management and the same workforce;
• upon reincorporation and ostensible transfer of ownership, dismissing all the employees
and declaring the existing labor contract null and void, then rehiring the workers as new
employees with worsened labor conditions;
• demanding additional concessions from workers in new negotiations with the union,
often provoking a strike;
• replacing workers who exercise the right to strike, and
• as a result, provoking a union “decertification” election to rid itself of collective
bargaining obligations altogether.”

Furthermore, as you know, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has issued numerous complaints actions against Cummins’s distribution companies. For example, regarding Cummins Northwest, the NLRB has issued complaints in several Unfair Labor Practice cases filed by Cummins Northwest unions in the 2006-2007 period for a variety of serious infractions of U.S. labor law by the Company and its representatives.

A new case was filed on August 6, 2007 by Teamsters Local 690, and is under investigation.   The charge is under NLRA section 8(a)(5) Refusal to Bargain (Initial Contract).   This is a new contract negotiation only insofar as Cummins representatives voided the former contract when Cummins Northwest Inc. was reincorporated in 2006 as Cummins Northwest LLC, as described at length in Prof. Compa’s report cited above.  The numerous complaints issued by the NLRB against Cummins Northwest, a joint venture of Cummins Inc., for the period from November 29, 2006 to May 31, 2007 are summarized in an attachment to this letter.

Irrespective of the legal outcome, the problems with Cummins’s distribution segment continue to escalate and will harm Cummins’s reputation and long term shareholder value.

As shareowners we believe that Cummins’s actions are inconsistent with the good corporate workplace human rights policies otherwise endorsed or adopted by Cummins. Cummins has a code of conduct, applicable to all its subsidiaries and joint ventures, requiring respect for the right of employees to freely associate in labor unions for the purpose of collective bargaining.   While some of Cummins’s actions may be legal under U.S. law, they clearly appear incompatible with the company’s own internal codes of conduct and unnecessarily tarnish the good image and reputation Cummins otherwise enjoys internationally. Human Rights Watch report on Wal-Mart’s labor rights practices, Discounting Rights: Wal-Mart’s Violation of US Workers’ Right to Freedom of Association, concluded that many of its anti-union tactics are lawful in the United States, though they combine to undermine workers’ rights. By breaking existing collective bargaining agreements through corporate reorganizations, while facility management stays the same, it certainly appears that Cummins’s intention is to break the union representation of its workers. We are also concerned by reports of safety problems due to inexperienced replacement workers at some Cummins facilities.

In addition, we are concerned that Cummins’s actions may not comply with international standards for workplace human rights codified in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, United Nations Global Compact (Principle 3), Conventions of the International Labour Organization (ILO), and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (Employment and Industrial Relations Chapters). The most basic workplace human right is that all workers have the right to form and join trade unions for the purpose of collective bargaining, in order to protect and further their interests, without interference in regards to these activities or the exercise of the functions connected to trade union activity (ILO Conventions 87 and 98). Neutrality is explicit in ILO Convention 98. A key principle of United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights is the right to form and join a trade union for the protection of an individual’s interests (Article 23-4).  We believe that it would be in the best interests of Cummins to uphold these conventions and other international standards for workplace human rights, in addition to respecting all local laws with regard to freedom of association.

We recommend that Cummins take the following steps:

  • Establish a third-party independent monitoring system.  The Company and its unions will agree upon a selected monitor of the company’s existing workplace rights policies.
  • Establish the terms of reference for the monitoring system.  The monitor would negotiate the terms of reference with the Company and its unions.
  • The terms of reference would include the issuance of a retrospective report to shareholders and other stakeholders with a discussion of Cummins’s existing policies and any deficiencies in the company’s labor practices that could result in non-compliance with the ILO Declaration, perceptions by important stakeholders of non-compliance with the ILO Declaration, or avoidable labor conflict.
  • In addition, the independent monitor would issue a prospective report that includes a mechanism for resolving disputes that would be binding on both parties.

As a result of the escalating situation and our ongoing concerns, we request a meeting and dialogue with Cummins to discuss the following:

  • What concrete measures or plans does Cummins have to help resolve its labor disputes with the Teamsters and other labor unions?
  • What steps does Cummins take to promote good labor relations and to uphold international standards for workplace human rights, at its own facilities and those of its subsidiaries, joint ventures, distribution franchises and suppliers?
  • We understand Cummins aspires to be a socially responsible company in all aspects of business. However, we are concerned that Cummins appears to be hostile to the principle of ‘neutrality’ towards workers’ freedom of association and their right to join, change, or refuse to join a union. We would like an explanation of your position. (See Cummins rebuttal to Prof. Compa’s report, posted on the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre August 21, 2007.)
  • In reference to ‘neutrality’, do you intend to abide by ILO Convention 87 and 98 and rectify violations, if any, and specifically where ILO Convention 98 (article 1, 2,3) states: “Workers shall enjoy adequate protection against acts of anti-union discrimination in respect of their employment…Workers and employers organizations shall enjoy adequate protection against any acts of interference by each other…”?
  • How does Cummins plan to address these issues in its Corporate Social Responsibility reports?

Please respond to our shareowner concerns by October 30, 2007.  Please contact Steven Heim, Boston Common Asset Management, 84 State Street, Suite 1000, Boston, MA 02109, by telephone: 617-720-5557 or 802-223-4627, fax: 617-720-5665, or email: sheim@bostoncommonasset.com.

Sincerely,

Steven Heim                                        
Director of Social Research                  
Boston Common Asset Management     

Nevin Dulabaum                                               Susan Vickers, RSM
Director of Socially Responsible Investing           VP Community Health
Brethren Benefit Trust, Inc.                               Catholic Healthcare West

Endowment Investment Committee of the           Carole Lombard, SSJ
Paulist Center Worshipping Community              Congregation of Sisters of St. Joseph of Boston,MA                                                        Boston, MA

Adam M. Kanzer                                              Sr. Kathleen Coll                                  
Managing Director & General Counsel               Shareholder Advocacy Administrator
Domini Social Investments LLC                         Catholic Healthcare East

Stephen Abrecht                                               Jack Ucciferri
Director                                                            Research and Advocacy Director
SEIU Master Trust                                            Harrington Investments, Inc.

Valerie Heinonen, o.s.u.
Consultant, Corporate Social Responsibility
Mercy Investment Program & Sisters of Mercy, Regional Community of Detroit Charitable Trust

cc:  Dean Cantrell, Director Investor Relations
       Marya Rose, Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary


1 Lance Compa, Every Abuse - Violations of International Labor Standards by Cummins: The Manipulation of Corporate Governance to De-Unionize its American Workforce, July 2007

 

  Home | Liturgy | Info | Groups | Education | News
  ©The Paulist Center 2004